Capital of Smog
January 2013: Beijing's hazardous pollution has sparked widespread anger in China
Chinese media reacted unusually strongly to dangerous levels of pollution recorded in many northern cities in January 2013. In the capital, Beijing, air pollution soared past levels considered hazardous by the World Health Organization. The official People's Daily said the smog was a "suffocating siege" which had to be urgently addressed. The state-run China Daily said the country had to learn to balance development with quality of life. The Global Times said China was risking serious long-term environmental damage. Smog also dominated social media sites.
For over a week, dense smog gathered over Beijing and some 30 other cities in northern and eastern China, with visibility down to 100m in some places. Official Beijing city readings suggested pollution levels of over 400. An unofficial reading from a monitor at the US embassy recorded levels of over 800. WHO guidelines say average concentrations of the tiniest pollution particles - called PM2.5 - should be no more than 25 microgrammes per cubic metre. Air is unhealthy above 100 microgrammes and at 300, all children and elderly people should remain indoors.
China's evening national news bulletins usually begin with reports of the country's leaders, shown attending meetings at long conference tables or inspecting successful government projects. In a departure from the norm, most of the broadcasts this weekend were devoted to the heavy blanket of smog covering Beijing and its surrounding provinces.
The state media was unusually eager to discuss the city's hazardous levels of pollution. Much of the coverage was devoted to health advisories for those affected by the smog. City newspapers printed diagrams illustrating the correct way to position a face mask.
Many of the city's vocal internet users and state-run media outlets issued calls for Beijing to reduce the number of vehicles on the city's roads and to limit the capital's reliance on coal-fired power plants. Experts predicted that it could take years to engineer a co-ordinated response to the smog, since much of the pollution in Beijing has blown in from heavy industry in provinces surrounding the capital.
Once inhaled, the tiny particles can make people more vulnerable to respiratory infections, as well as leading to increased mortality from lung cancer and heart disease. The Xinhua news agency said there had been a sharp rise in people seeking treatment at the hospitals in the capital for respiratory problems.
One mother of an eight-month-old baby stated her child had suffered from lung problems for months and that they recently worsened after an outing. Mrs Li said she had resorted to keeping a basin of water in the house in the hope it might act as an air purifier. "It would be helpful if the city has less cars and the city could [place] curbs on car emissions" she said.
Although Beijing authorities announced that pollution levels had dropped to around 350, school children were kept indoors and media reports warned the public to do the same, and to avoid strenuous activity.
The build up of pollution has been put down to a lack of wind and a cold spell, rather than a surge in production of pollutants. But an editorial in China Daily said there was no reason "for us to not reflect on what we've contributed to the smoggy days". It blamed the pollution on poor urban planning and the rapid increase in car ownership, saying residents had to cut down their use of private cars:
"In the middle of a rapid urbanisation process, it is urgent for China to think about how such a process can press forward without compromising the quality of urban life with an increasingly worse living environment. The air quality in big cities could have been better had more attention been paid to the density of the high rises, had more trees been planted in proportion to the number of residential areas, and had the number of cars been strictly controlled. These are the lessons China should learn for its further urbanization."
The People's Daily, official mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, ran a front page editorial demanding: "Let us clearly view managing environmental pollution with a sense of urgency." The Global Times said measures taken so far to address pollution in China, which it called the "biggest construction site in the world", had failed to alleviate the problem. It accused the government of dealing with environmental problems in too low-key a way, and called on it to "publish truthful environmental data to the public" to allow the country to solve the problem:
"The public should understand the importance of development as well as the critical need to safeguard the bottom line of environmental pollution"